mindsbackyard

Thanks, I haven't given much thought on `Send` at all when developing the crate. As mentioned in #5 I'm working on a rewrite, though I have no ETA yet. I'll...

I had a look at this one and it seems to be tricky to solve. The problem occurs because if a test with a fixture fails, the library prints additional...

Definitely on the list for a future version. Although the difference output would need to be coded for each matcher. Some matchers (especially the collection matchers) have already customized error...

Thanks for the info. This seems partly related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50820 for which there's currently no easy fix as the proc_macros generate modules to avoid name clashes. I'm currently working on...

Thanks for your input! Yes that's a feature which would come in handy if setup/tear-down costs are high. On the other hand you might risk leaking state from one test...

Thanks for your interest in the library. Right now it is in a kind of slumber as you might have guessed. I didn't have the opportunity to continue work with...

First of all: no this is currently not supported. Abstracting test cases over types is an issue although only relevant in a few specific situations---I'd be interested in yours. I've...

**tl;dr** Seems like `sd-aarch64-installer` is not an installer image (anymore) but a no-installer image (now) I took a look into this issue and found that it goes a little bit...

(sry I know that this is an old issue) Thanks! I'm not exactly what the problem is but the purpose for `has_structure!` is exactly the above scenario. Maybe I missed...

I'm on a longer hiatus from this project as I stopped using Rust professionally. I'd like to pick it up again once I figure out which functionality would contribute most...