Michal Nazarewicz

This looks like duplicate of https://github.com/tridactyl/tridactyl/issues/1711

But why?

So rather than adding it to status it might be better to add a metric for it?

So a question now is, should it be a separate metric whose value is the timestamp, or perhaps label on the existing near_node_protocol_version metric.

So Prometheus doesn’t have `label_value` function I see. Yes, that means that separate metric is the only viable option. `and` will need to be used to pick timestamp for the...

This going to be included in 1.31

I think we should show both numbers. Perhaps as `100+17 validators`?

I must say though I’m not a fan of linking to screenshots in commit messages. I’m especially not a fan of making screenshots of plain text logs.

For the future xz or bzip2 instead of gzip might improve situation. Though at the end of the day, if adding a 25MB file is the best way to test...

It looks like there’s some kind of leak in Store objects? After getting SIGINT the node stops doing anything it looks like so it seems like `actix::System::current().stop();` successfully stopped everything...