Emilia Bopp

fine by me for now… I'll leave this issue open nonetheless, also because there is more to it.

Interesting… this might take some work to update the code accordingly.

Lots of implementation details rely on that, merely because it was part of the generic bounds for all functions for a long time. I think it might be a viable...

One concrete issue is that poisoning the global transaction mutex has pretty bad consequences and thus should be avoided using `try!`.

#22 resolves the most common practical concerns, but is far from a general solution. However, it appears that Rust's type system can not accomodate such a solution, until it gets...

There was [an idea on Reddit](http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2trkyb/functional_reactive_event_handling/co2a8e7)

The situation here has not changed after the internals redesign.

There is a [Rust implementation of STM](https://crates.io/crates/stm) now.

Note, that the terminology in carboxyl has changed, since I wrote this issue. It's no longer cell/stream, but stream/signal, where signal is the continuously changing value and a stream is...

Hm… this seems weird to me. Granted it is semantically clear what switching on a `Signal` **ought** to do. However, I am having trouble imagining how to use & implement...