Milan Curcic

Somewhat related is #106. Rather than implementing a specific (fixed-format) time stamp, I recommend simply providing a [binding to C `strftime`](https://github.com/wavebitscientific/datetime-fortran/blob/9bd51beef9c4abdf0098854387987f0ac40dc879/src/datetime_module.f90#L181), which is a much more versatile solution with less...

> In my use cases, I typically need to add elements to the end, in which case array works great. Me too, but how do you do it? I thought...

@ChetanKarwa Thanks and great start with the implementation. As you can probably tell, it will be a longer journey to nail down the requirements and implementation details, so don't expect...

> You shouldn't have get or insert, as random access with a linked list is slow. I don't think that's a good argument. An operation being slow doesn't make it...

@certik, I think to make the comparison equivalent, you need to grow the array in the loop, like a list or set is doing. So: ``` ... allocate(s(0)) call system_clock(c0,...

> Do you know if a Fortran compiler is allowed to implement s = [s, real(i, dp)] by doubling the allocation and copying data? If so, then it would be...

Thank you, Steve. While it may be trivial for you, I suspect it's not as easy for the average Fortran programmer, and especially not for a novice. We're targeting newcomers...

Steve, thanks, that's music to my ears. And if you agree, we can indicate in the commit message that it is co-authored by you, which GitHub will pick up and...

This seems useful and in scope. I often work with MAT files (of various versions) from colleagues and I use SciPy.io `loadmat` and `savemat`. For my own interoperable binary data...

PPM is good enough for start! I agree on the advantage of pure Fortran implementation. We can adopt your implementations, they're good. I also have a P3 writer (same as...