Michael Ingold

@juliohm I need to work out a git merge conflict but the new macro seems to work well. I’m planning to add tests to verify that deliberately-unsupported intersecting methods throw...

The macro doesn't currently act on the argument types, the current logic is basically: - make sure the provided expression is a regular or generic function definition - locate the...

> In the meantime, can you please elaborate on the two use cases? How are you using Complex and Dual? I also ran into this error constructing complex-typed geometries earlier...

Now that I’ve had more time to think about this, I’m not sure the ability to request non-Cartesian outputs makes a lot of sense. The syntax might be confusing since...

I haven’t had time lately to keep up with the CRS progress, but now that it’s live I’ll try to check it over the new few days.

I just updated the tests to address the line that Codecov reported as missing coverage, plus a couple of other lines in the same file. Two of these new tests...

> To check whether the top and bottom planes intersect, we can > > ```julia > intersectsplanes(c) = isnothing(c.top ∩ c.bot) && radius_check > ``` > > where `radius_check` is...

~~Are you able to re-trigger the CI run @juliohm? Looks like the tests all pass, but 3 of the CI runs seem to have just failed to run at all...

Just came over to mention this occurs when trying to compose **DynamicQuantities.jl** with the geometric representations from **Meshes.jl**. ```julia using DynamicQuantities using Meshes Meshes.Point(1.0m, 2.0m) ``` Example error stack trace:...

Thanks again for the quick fix to `float(T)`, @MilesCranmer ! I just updated [my LineIntegrals.jl](https://github.com/mikeingold/LineIntegrals.jl) package to enable tests with DynamicQuantities.jl and have run into a new hurdle. I don't...