Mike May

Can we include `readonly` structs and members in this exercise.

copied my comment to the `constants` exercise exercism/v3#1044.

`arrays` / `for-loops` sounds like a good place for `++` and `--`.

> Using reflection to read attributes. I can't help feeling that if we don't allow attributes to be read not only will custom attributes seem rather pointless but the compiler...

> Maybe we should have reflection as a prerequisite of this exercise? The trade-off is complexity (of bringing in reflection either as part of exercise or a prerequisite) vs. leaving...

Consider forking some of [tuples](https://github.com/exercism/v3/tree/master/languages/elixir/exercises/concept/tuples) from the elixir track.

Include use of discards.

> I understand the student's point of view when the relationship breaks down. What if we could offer the student the same choice we offer mentors: the chance to break...

> I do think it would be nice to be able to see a trail of previous interactions This is a good idea.

@bkhl I understand the objection that a problem with the idea of extended mentoring is that learners will get restricted input (possibly even poor quality) from Exercise because they are...