Mika Senghaas
Mika Senghaas
+1 on this -- making this high prio internally to have more graceful handling of invalid tool call formats
probably completion len yea
yea, this was a breaking change in our core `prime` package. upgrading the package should resolve the issue!
> @mikasenghaas can we remove the `probabilities` field? then should be good to merge. done!
okay, so looked a bit further and looks like this is how Pydantic handles fields that are typed as `typing.Iterable`. It [seems to be used for infinite generators](https://docs.pydantic.dev/1.10/usage/types/#infinite-generators) (and as...
Update: This also causes issues with tool calls as they are also typed with `typing.Iterable`