Mikael RANDY

Results 12 comments of Mikael RANDY

Sorry for the long time answer. Feel free to fork and create a PR, it could be very useful for the bundle to had new contributors.

My initial reaction was to find solution 2 easier to understand, but the @jubianchi last argument finally convinced me for the solution 3

This evening, i try to work on this, and i have some questions that i can't find the answers. - Is it wise to automatically add stubs, without any check...

In my opinion, the current CHANGELOG already follow a convention : All merged PR are added under the `# dev-master` section, and create a new release is "just" adding the...

It's not because it's possible to write bad code that atoum should not be able to test it. @Hywan your example is a piece of bad code (for me) and...

@jubianchi i agree with that ! Obviously ! Trait is not a bad designed code, on the contrary. And i think atoum should allow to test it to encourage it...

The point i want to show up is a trait could contain a public method, with some internal complexity who i want to test. Consider this exemple : ``` php...

hum ... extensions are they really used ? I think if the functionnality not in the core, it will not be used. (i understand i could be wrong, but from...

Yes : Core / No : extension ? :+1: