Maren Ihlemann

Tests are passing now (for julia 1.6, as julia 1.2 seems no longer supported because of @spawn).

Just following up on this: IS this already in the docs? (couldn't find it but maybe I overlooked it)

This one will first require an in-depth discussion on what the best/desired way is to incorporate vintage and economic discounting into SpineOpt in the future. Then we can see whether...

#476 is also related to this

We talked about this during our last SpineOpt call. Renaming is possible to `fix_ratio_unit_flow_to_node_from_node`. Migration/upgrade will be necessary. Leaving this open until finalized.

I don’t think anyone has implemented this. So this is still an open bug in the user constraint.On Nov 17, 2023, at 15:40, Lauren Clisby ***@***.***> wrote: @mihlema Is this...

We could e.g. check for scenarios not used in the stochastic structure and filter them out in preprocessing. Also, I think at the moment each stochastic structure needs to be...

Hi @RowanPeng thanks for opening this issue. I think you have discovered a bug here, that should be resolved. Problem seems to be related to history of representative days, if...

Similarly, for the `fix_ratio` etc. constraints, a similar problem could occur, but here we avoid the problem by associating the parameter with the stochastic scenario of the right-hand side variable.

I'll try to kick-off the conversation here. The tricky part is that we would need to decide, which scenario would take precedence in this situation. For the time slices, we...