Mick Hansen

@cdupetit Not possible to define primaryKey on associations like that. But in any case, Folder has a composite primary key across siteId, serverId, shareId and Server has a primary key...

@ozum Personally never used composite primary keys in my life (age old habit of having `id` on everything). We'd definitely love to have PRs to improve support here. Seeing as...

@ozum Makes sense.

@eighteight It's certainly feasible, can't give you a timeline though. Developers do what they can when they can :) I hope to take a look at this feature early in...

@cdupetit Your example assumes that the primary keys are named the same as the foreign keys, that's not an assumption we make at the moment. Not sure what syntax would...

@bjrmatos A set of arrays where indexes must be equal is a way to go, we could also add a new `{[foreignKey]: [targetKey]}` matching syntax, although that might conflict with...

Not currently possible but it's something we've discussed before. A solution could be to store a representation of the current models in the database, and the next time you can...

@cusspvz i'm aware, i was just giving an update for anyone checking it :)

@saikat It's a matter of actually doing the work, coming up with the design is pretty straight forward

@AlexHayton No one is to my knowledge. Implementing it comes down to a few steps. First we want to make sure that describeTable can handle almost all cases, and that...