Michael Sharp
Michael Sharp
@JakeRadMSFT @luisquintanilla what do you guys think? With the updates we are planning/proposing to automl how would that affect this?
Thanks for letting us know. We should be returning them in the same order, so if we aren't thats definitely a bug. Can you share a whole sample pipeline so...
how many trees are you using? Is there anything else you are doing in your code besides what you listed here?
@luisquintanilla @torronen is this something we think should be built in to load? I can see it going both ways honestly. I would probably lean towards having it built in...
Yeah, we have an issue with the naming of the join/merge API's. I haven't looked closely enough at join to know exactly how it works, but it does NOT work...
If we are just wanting to add the concept of "execution provider" with onnx, we would probably just want to have a way to specify this stuff in our onnx...
@Srujana-Oruganti sorry for the delay on this. Thanks for taking the time to submit it. It looks good! Is this something you are still interested in working with us on?...
@LittleLittleCloud any thoughts on this? I am not supe familiar with how AutoML is doing this stuff. Is this going to be fixed/changed by your AutoML changes? Or something I...
It may be easier to just lock the version until we are able to fully get it updated. Does your tentative implementation fully work?