Michael Champion

I like @mnot 's characterization: > Term limits are a widely-recognised, time-tested mechanism to **assure that people don't get rusted into roles** Asking incumbents to step away for at least...

Yea I’m suggesting limiting to (4?) CONSECUTIVE terms. People could stay involved with “emeritus” status so their perspective not lost. And run in a future election if they wish ....

Thanks for the data @cwilso . They certainly discredit my suggestion for a 4-term limit, which would not solve many real problems! But to be fair, @marcoscaceres proposed a 5...

@cwilso the spreadsheet I'm using (hand-edited from reading AC-Members posts, could have errors, as could the formulas) is at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19qZk2Ywt4oMs9wpv_SYwlHG0G1Sj9y4LLvYHHHYJI1w/edit#gid=0 and should be readable by all The 2009-2017 percentages for...

I agree it's time for the Process to explicitly discuss CGs / BGs, and clarify their relationship to IGs and WGs. Some thoughts off the top of my head: -...

I might be the only current person whose access to W3C resources comes from "emeritus" status on the AB. Other AB veterans such as Chaals and Tantek are AC reps...

Agree with @mnot . I’m more interested in a forum for FUTURE TAG and AB members to build the necessary skills while sharing fresh perspectives

Closing for lack of support, and the AB/TAG seem convinced the Council mechanism can work. We shall see.

Where do we stand in terms of resolving this issue? I like mnot's framing in https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/620#issuecomment-1262993087. > A benevolent dictator worked for a long time, but I think we all...

@darobin makes some good points: - " it's best to avoid candidates getting in by default, just because there's room." Right. And with Meek STV, extra open seats will not...