Michael Osipov

I have an open umbrella ticket for LibreSSL in general. @markt-asf Should we continue to pursue to support LibreSSL?

> If at all possible I would greatly appreciate if libressl support was not dropped since some people do still use it, although I would not mind dropping support for...

> @michael-o I updated the first commit to remove the outdated code instead and set the first supported version as libressl `3.5.2` which is the first stable version of the...

> My main reasons are that libressl has a better track record with security and a significantly better build system. I also think its important to have viable alternative ssl...

> > and a significantly better build system. > > This is irrelevant, as downstream uses don't worry about build complexity. Build complexity may be a source of other issues,...

> > > there would need to be an appropriate Panama module > > > > > > What exactly is this? > > The plan is to migrate to...

> > > This changes behaviour so it would need to wait until 1.3 (if there ever is such a version). > Note that the current plan is that the...

@mturk You still owe me an explanation what will break for you.

@mturk Still waiting...

@mturk Still waiting...