Philo

To avoid making unauthorized modifications to the native kernel code that could affect everyone's compatibility, we have made some revisions under our platform. You can check out the code-level solutions...

> Thank you so much for reporting these issues and even supplying solutions. Could you please create one issue per problem? Done.

These issues are separate in #343 #344 #345 #346 #347 #348

> Hi all, adding the VRRP protocol implementation in SONiC would be a great improvement for me; really good job. > > While reading the HLD, I left some comments...

> @philo-micas There was a review request covering VRRP functionality earlier. #475 Please see if it can be combined with your proposal. @prvattem From the aspect of RFC, two proposals...

> https://github.com/openconfig/public/blob/5ef541dd3d468239f07d69fb05a4dbc9e3f7476b/release/models/interfaces/openconfig-if-ip.yang#L896 OK

> Hi all, sorry to spam again, but I need to do it because it affects some of my previous comments (not reviews); I am only just aware that VRRP...

> @philo-micas can you please help to check the code PRs? Will Micas target 202405 release for this feature or move to future release? Thanks. Code change will be ready...

A large number of DHCPv6 messages may also cause the resources of the DHCP Server to be consumed. Whether to consider supporting the rate limit of DHCPv6 messages?

> Hi all, many thanks for that and for your work. > > I just have one major concern regarding the actual and the future architecture: why is [`vrrpmgr`](https://github.com/philo-micas/sonic-swss/blob/d58a143c67099c4d73522b01b7bc7f220797e518/cfgmgr/vrrpmgr.cpp#L134-L154) adding...