Anna
Anna
Not iTIP neccessarily, but we're working on iMIP at the moment (RFC6047).
> > Not iTIP neccessarily, but we're working on iMIP at the moment (RFC6047). > > Let us know if you need any help in implementation. This feature is kind...
We possibly only need to add the GUEST propety as COMMENT is an RFC defined field and should ideally be supported by the scheduling plugin (i. e. fix it upstream).
Relevant quote from the RFC: ```text 3.8.1.4. Comment Property Name: COMMENT Purpose: This property specifies non-processing information intended to provide a comment to the calendar user. Value Type: TEXT Property...
I think I know why Georg made this email a REPLY and not a CANCEL. As the email sender is our system internal email address, a correct implementation of iMIP...
Yeah I was more thinking NC to NC internally.
@st3iny sorry I forgot to tell you: there will be two new endpoints for processing the invitations/responses but you can use them almost the same as the createFromString. I just...
> > CANCEL requests must be from the right email address and the right organiser or they shouldn't be processed. (but what if we send them from NC from the...
> > Well we don't want private dependecies in other apps but we still want to write to CalDAV... > > Why not just use CalDAV over HTTP then? Be...
 F*CK YEAH