mi-hol

> https://github.com/FOME-Tech/FOME-Baseline/issues/8#issuecomment-1373069122): https://github.com/FOME-Tech/FOME-Baseline/issues/8 seems a private repo, I don't have access

with the decision taken to keep debug mode the currently empty FOME wiki page needs content. is the RE content copied below applicable? "Debug fields is an advanced troubleshooting feature...

> more worthwhile to just move the stuff we care about to their own channels and remove the debug modes @mck1117 sounds great, but will this task make it into...

@tobiasKaminsky seems this question hasn't got a final conclusion. Actually its the same question a friend asked when I recommended nextcloud instead of buying a NAS,

duplicate of https://github.com/thomasnordquist/MQTT-Explorer/issues/831

@EspoTek WoW! That was quick! Very much appreciated!

reopened to not forget about outstanding work for branch "vincenzo1207"

> All done! Left Vincenzo's branch just in case there's FFT fixes in there. :) I'll take care of that and assigned to myself

@espotek-org/maintainers it seems [Vincenzo-Petrolo](https://github.com/espotek-org/Labrador/commits?author=Vincenzo-Petrolo) added DFT (described in https://github.com/kfrlib/kfr?tab=readme-ov-file#fftdft) in [this](https://github.com/espotek-org/Labrador/compare/master...vincenzo1207) branch I have unfortunately no clue if that is beneficial for Labrador, therefore I'd like to ask one of...

> I don't know how you connected [Vincenzo-Petrolo](https://github.com/espotek-org/Labrador/commits?author=Vincenzo-Petrolo) with the [kfr](https://github.com/kfrlib/kfr) project, but **Vincenzo** implemented the DFT using [fftw3](https://www.fftw.org/) library which is not used in the **kfr** project. It seemed...