Mark Frawley

This is actually something we got bitten by too, the ISO standard and some IETF RFCs all indicate that 0 is Sunday, what standard is this library using?

Is there any plan to merge this? Seems to be incredibly long in the works. Thanks

@cjwirth It may be self-promotion but since I didn't find it by googling it's useful info, I'm grateful for the tip.

Isn't this a bug in the library? can the above patch be generalised and merged?

@alfonsogarciacaro This is a really cool if very alpha project. As another outsider I would vote for proposal 2 above, if only because it makes sense for my use case...

@alfonsogarciacaro I understand and I would basically be happy with any module standard as long as I can export an interface per module (exposed methods/properties). e.g. your own proposal from...

Thanks, that also answers my questions about the TS type providers not working for me (except the basic DOM types which work great). If you want someone to test once...

Would also love this feature

+1

I managed to find the namespace and using the fully qualified name for box it works i.e. Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Operators.box but needless to say this doesn't feel less hacky.