Chris Laprun

@gsmet I need to check with the new changes, I was OK with the initial version.

As long as the test result is available from the context so that a test resource can figure out if tests have failed at some point, that's good enough for...

Should this be part of operator-framework/enhancements instead?

I’ve started doing a comparative analysis of the different projects to see where they converge and what different things they cover. Depending on what might make sense for inclusion, it...

> I think we can collect the feature additions relevant to SDK here for now. Maybe just keep a running checklist in the description of features we want to consider...

Do I get this talk on governance right to mean that the current thinking is to not include any of the functionality described above at this point?

My point of view on this issue is that it's meant to determine which functionality (if any) from the above libraries / framework would be good candidate for inclusion with...

> @joelanford that sounds like a good delineation. Based on this typography, it seems as if the library contributions would be best targeted at `controller-runtime` rather than this project. >...

This is something I've been thinking about as well, even started looking into it. This will be a major change, though and if we're going to do it, we should...

Yea but the idea here is to be able to use what's in `CustomResource` without having to import the full client dependencies. That said, it might make sense to completely...