mertwole
mertwole
I'd take `json_group_array` and `jsonb_group_array`
I'll also take `json_group_object` and `jsonb_group_object`
I'll also take `json_array` and `jsonb_array`
@weiznich Do you have any thoughts on how variadic functions support should be implemented? I had some thoughts on it and it seems like the most reasonable way of doing...
@weiznich What do you mean by that we "know" these types? All we know about the argument types is that they implement `SqlType + SingleValue`, so I suppose there're only...
@weiznich So maybe then approach with `#[variadic]` will fit? As I see the most functions (`json(b)_extract`, `json(b)_insert`, `json(b)_remove`, `json(b)_replace`, `json(b)_set`) can be implemented with only 2-3 variants and still be...
@weiznich Ok, you're right, this seems like a more flexible approach
I'll also take `json_remove` and `jsonb_remove`
This issue is connected with https://github.com/gear-tech/gear-bridges/issues/63. If bridge will move to `BEEFY` signatures then `GANDPA` will not be used as a finality oracle.