Graeme Yeates

@akre54 I feel we should off on this until underscores methods are improved. It could reduce the bloat from this implementation

Agreed with @tgriesser (as long as the branches remain rebasable), and :+1: to adding `BB.Promise`

Its pretty common for (major) plugin developers to fall into this trap and thrash the sync environment by storing access to the original/previous sync in a way that may conflict....

How would the fallback work? Should we change it to using an array

I'd rather wait til 2.0 before anything radical is done to bind. Though we could definitely work towards 2.0/underdash soon

Any hints to get this working jdd?

The issue is the fallback for old ie will be inconsistent

The best way to handle this may be to do as jdd decided and drop explicit support for non es5 and defer this stuff to es5-shim

It's part of the test suite, do you really think its necessary to reset it afterwards?

Its faster for the `iteratee` (which are most common from my experience) and all object cases so thats good enough for me :+1: