Mike Parker

IMO, this is not the best approach to describing interfaces in D. An interface isn't inherited, it's implemented. And they aren't really abstract classes---all classes are subclasses of `Object`, but...

> Maybe there is a different technical term? Classes in D are more akin to those of Java than C++. There, interfaces are usually "implemented" rather than "inherited". Though really,...

Regardless, if it's clarity you want, then you shouldn't use the term "abstract class" in the interface documentation. Those two words together have a very specific meaning in D, and...

@dkorpel Once the Ddoc stuff is good to go, please do give it the greenlight.

@maxhaton Please don't forget about this.

@ibuclaw @Geod24 What's the situation with this?

Thanks, @thewilsonator. Please set the status to Draft.

@thewilsonator Please email me!

@wilzbach I'm going to agree with @jacob-carlborg about focus. As it reads now, it sounds more like a DIP for named arguments than for struct initialization. IMO, consistency is the...

Please add your name and contact info to the author field. You can remove Walter's.