mcuee
mcuee
> @mcuee Does this look reasonable? [devEmbedded@1f10388](https://github.com/devEmbedded/libusb/commit/1f10388a04bb17c63848f3ca8ffa8338cc50b428) This looks better. @tormodvolden Please take a look at the above proposal as well. Thanks.
> Thanks for the links! Can this change break applications though, if the same code works on Linux and macOS (where multiple transfers already are allowed)? The change request does...
Maybe this is good to have for the future 1.0.27 release if there are more reviewers jumping in. Not so sure when @dickens will have the time to come back.
I am think this will be good for isoc transfer as well -- just need to port the code to isoc transfer. But of course it will be more complex...
Glad that there are more discussions here. Hopefully a better solution can be proposed from that discussion. * https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/490
So it seems that this pull request is not working. The approach in https://github.com/devEmbedded/libusb/tree/dev_raw_io is the way to go. @PetteriAimonen Please help to change the pull request. Thanks.
I am thinking just the other branch with libusb_set_option().
@tormodvolden How do you like this one to progress?
@tormodvolden What is your opinion here? I am more leaning towards Option 4 or Option 6.
https://github.com/pyusb/pyusb/issues/159 Related pyusb issue.