Mark Sauder

> @mcsauder Could you give more context regarding this change? Hi @Jaeyoung-Lim , certainly. I have only been using jmavsim since upgrading to Ubuntu 20.04 because it initially had build...

> If this PR is un concern of 21.04, currently we do not support 21.04 as our dev environment, but since this doesnt break our primary dev environment(18.04 and 20.04)...

Hi again @Jaeyoung-Lim , [PR #17644](https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/issues/17644) appears to have some additional details on the MacOS failure in this PR.

> @mcsauder This seems stale now, and the macOS seems to be running fine again. > > I will close this for now, but please feel free to reopen if...

Hi everyone, these two PR's are related to this issue so I thought I'd post them here. Once/if these are merged upstream I'll help out with work on the MAVSDK...

Hi @xinnad , > I modified what was in the original PR because if a drone's altitude fell within the vertical window the buffer zone check always returned true. I...

> I think the behavior from the original geofence is "if the vertical window is set, the drone must be within the vertical limit, as well as within the polygon."...

Hi @xinnad, I think I've spotted an easy way to make it user configurable whether internal or external, so let's have it both ways! Give me a day or two...

@xinnad , inner and outer buffer zones are now available in #20055 by allowing positive and negative buffer distances. I've also fixed the cases for exclusion fences that were incorrect...

Hi @xinnad, you've probably noticed that PR #20055 has changed substantially in the past week. PR #20172 also alters things further. I agree that inner and outer causes confusion. If...