Jake McGinty

@bensteinberg Don't worry, I don't feel hassled in the slightest! This is quite helpful to talk through. Yeah, I agree that innernet currently fits best as a PPA or external...

Hey @ptman, I'm assuming by vanilla wireguard you mean connecting to innernet with only `wg`/netlink commands? The invitation system would be the most complicated part to address without the `innernet`...

>I was mostly thinking about non-Linux. Android and iOS. Windows. BSDs should be possible with current client, since it works on macOS? I don't imagine BSD works 100% right now,...

@codegamc Yeah, I think now's a good time to document the protocol - I'll add that as a task for myself.

Thanks @cmcaine, and thanks for opening the issue for clarification. Sorry for the delay in responding. > Could you expand on the security properties here? Specifically: > 1. When will...

@KhalilSantana yeah, I'm definitely in favor of adding a rekey feature, because you're right that at the moment the only way to do that feels hacky/messy (creating a new peer...

@Eeems that's great to hear! Thanks for reporting back on that here. None of us at tonari are Windows users at the moment which is why it's unsupported now, but...

Related to https://github.com/tonarino/innernet/issues/30 since it's a similar functionality request. I think this would be a great feature, but the exact way to implement it doesn't yet feel 100% clear. Will...

I'm so sorry that it took me so long to comment! Polarizing is open source's middle name ;). I'm really excited for all the thought and work you put in...

Hey @sydbarrett74! `innernet` doesn't have FreeBSD support right now (none of the maintainers use it, so we're looking for someone willing to take that on), so some methods like the...