Jake McGinty

Yeah, maybe having an optional `metrics` feature would be the right way to do this (and when enabled, reports metrics using that metrics crate).

Maybe another question worth asking is: how hard would it be to add async support after the initial release? Would it require major API changes?

Thanks for opening the issue and I'm glad you came across the project! That's a very unhelpful error message we currently spit out for `delete-cidr`, but I think functionality-wise it...

This makes sense to me, and thank you for such a well-justified PR. I agree this is the way forward, however I have some concerns about current users of innernet...

@alerque I like the stub binary idea that returns an error code! Since I was planning on doing a release imminently, maybe I'll the "soft" version where in this release...

Agreed. It's been long enough, lol. Sorry @alerque for not having a more deliberate transition plan in place. Perhaps this is a good time to do a minor version bump...

You can manually edit the innernet configuration file at `/etc/innernet/your-network.conf` at your own peril, which is where the server's external endpoint is defined, if that's what you mean. Sorry if...

For what it's worth, I think with the advent of more DNS implementations that support plugins like CoreDNS, innernet can and should focus on offering multiple name resolution options besides...

Out of curiosity, does doing `innernet down && innernet up ` make any difference compared to `innernet fetch `? Also, it might be worth checking some basic things like the...

I'm in agreement, I think innernet should stop releasing "official" deb or rpm files since they're bound to continue to cause headaches (or overload people with the variations necessary for...