Michael Clarke

Can you try removing and re-applying the sonar.core.serverBaseURL? I can't replicate your issue, but suspect there's something that's causing the protocol to be dropped by the Sonarqube when reading the...

Limiting the number of reported issues sounds reasonable, providing it's then clear in a summary or comment that the output is truncated. Does filtering not still cause an issue with...

@szpak No, there isn't a way within the plugin. You're free to deploy your own copy of the plugin with alterations to the submission handling though.

The fact you're getting the Quality Gate status indicates the ability to post a summary comment is ok. I'd expect a failure to post a 'diff' comment would cause an...

I'm going to merge #58 once I've got it up-to-date and made sure things still work, but I'd suggest you stick with master for now. What I'm likely to do...

You've not provided enough details to allow this to be replicated: * Have you set the Sonarqube server URL in your Sonarqube configuration to be something other than 'localhost'?

@Orteko Are you sure that banner is coming from the Sonarqube instance with this plugin installed? It doesn't look like one the plugin produces.

I'm not sure I understand this issue: the latest 8.9 version does contain a plugin: https://hub.docker.com/layers/sonarqube-with-community-branch-plugin/mc1arke/sonarqube-with-community-branch-plugin/8.9-community/images/sha256-3256e8ca443ce930ff67c7288b8d3674f6b17da26e8be95366f6f89402997eef?context=explore. Are you running extra commands ontop of the container that expect 1.8.1 (rather than...

Closing since no further replication steps have been provided

@kcooney an interesting idea. I'm not completely convinced about using an environmental variable for this type of action. Consider running a CI server which wants to see files in one...