Michael Büsch

Nice. I'll keep this issue open. It probably is a question other people are interested in, too. Please feel free to add more discussion about slave support here.

Hi. Thanks for your question. This probably is where things go wrong: ``` DPM1: Ignoring telegram in DataExchange with slave 5: DpTelegram(da=0x02, sa=0x05, fc=0x02, dsap=None, ssap=None, du=Empty) ``` Your et200s...

Your code, configuration or gsd probably doesn't match your physical setup. Unfortunately the slaves are very picky about this and will usually completely refuse to work, if a very small...

As we need support from the `svd2rust` tool to properly implement this, the macro should probably also be moved into the generated code. The `svd2rust` could get a new option...

@MabezDev Please re-open this issue. The questions from my original post have not been addressed or answered in any way. What has been resolved is the essentially (as it turned...

Can somebody please re-open this issue? It has not been resolved. The problem that @mr-sven confimed as fixed turned out to be completely unrelated to my original question. Thanks a...

Cool. Thanks for explaining the reasons behind this. Yes, I do understand that often one shouldn't be using a busy loop. However, how can we achieve small latencies without doing...

The question was: Why is it a TODO? If this is so clearly defined, then this should be a panic instead.

Hi. Thanks for your question. Pyprofibus currently only supports master-slave communication out of the box.

Thanks for your question. Pyprofibus currently doesn't implement parsing of the gsd sections that it doesn't need. It will emit a warning for those sections to make clear to the...