Matt Browne

In case it helps, for this use case at least it wouldn't be necessary to replace the method (although maybe that would be most straightforward)...turning it into a regular private...

Of course, if you want to use private fields and methods, there's always this workaround—technically a private field (arrow function) rather than a private method: ```js class ComponentWithPrivateMembers { #x...

@mhofman > I'm wondering if allowing the accessor modifier on private methods would make sense? I think it could be a bit weird to expand the concept of "accessor" to...

@biro456 Thanks, it's nice to know this is possible. I'm not sure if the `this: T` part in the function you're returning is necessary unless you found that something didn't...

Aww ok, I hadn't inspected it closely yet but that makes sense. I believe the `bound` function only runs once.

I have a question that's somewhat related to this so I thought I'd start by posting a comment here. Reading the current proposal, it's currently unclear to me whether it...

Here's an example of an implementation that's currently doesn't work due to the ignored properties: class Entity { assignAttributes(attributes) { for (let key in attributes) { if (key in this)...

I created a repo earlier with a reproduction of this issue. Steps to reproduce: ``` git clone [email protected]:mbrowne/graphql-mesh-bug-repro.git --single-branch --branch grpc-source-issue cd graphql-mesh-bug-repro yarn yarn grpc:start ``` Then in another...

@michaelmohamed Unfortunately it's not that simple... TLDR if you just want to get it working, then I recommend downgrading to an older version of the grpc handler for now; I...

Sorry @rdking, that must have been a bad recollection on my part. I removed that from the original post.