Markus Schirp

> @mbj you could rename the not-on-authors-free-time tag as needs-funding to be more precise about what you require to work on the issue. Ack. I renamed to `needs-funding-or-external-pr`.

@tit I'd be happy to review a PR. Assuming the author of such a hypothetical PR would sign my CLA. Its unlikely authorship to happen on my time at this...

@zofrex not sure if I ever got your CLA? Really need to find a CLA bot here.

Mhh, you could always create a test like: ``` expect(that_object).to receive(:const_get).with(foo, false) ``` To "nail this specific API version". But still yeah, we should have a mechanism to whitelist certain...

I like the idea, but I do not have a need to do it for my projects. So tagging as not-on-authors-free-time to encourage funding or (preferred) outside contribution.

@tjchambers In summary you: Just followed the workflow to discover a higher order mutation. For many operators I emit these already in a single pass, mostly in cases where higher...

@Ana06 Looks like both, you are doing something wrong and there is a bug! What you likely do wrong is not forcing the constant to exist, its hard to tell...

@Ana06 I've looked at this repository, and found the api subproject. Running the specs requires setup I do not have the time to do. Do not want to setup mysql...

@Ana06 I'll try to get this done properly and have it in a release. OT: This change does just fix a crash where mutant could NOT find a good test...

Is greedyness more primitive than non greedyness?