Marcel Bargull

> FYI: particularly large example is antismash Particularly large, yes, but not very representative since it's one of those "special cases" where the bulk of its size is due to...

Making the archive creation more stable/deterministic and in consequence reproducible is a good thing that I support! However, we should make sure to not unnecessarily constrain ourselves by early decisions...

> It's still reproducible even if you sort it in a weird way, as long as someone else can run the same code on their machine. Right. What I meant...

Oh, my bad! The change from gh-5228 to use `str(file)` is simply wrong; we should just return the filename instead (this is what the previous `binary.name` did). Thanks for the...

IDK. AFAICT, `activate_in_script` is still an undocumented feature. There is not much to find with https://github.com/conda/conda-build/search?q=activate_in_script. https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/3695 https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/2735 https://github.com/conda/conda-build/blob/3.19.3/CHANGELOG.txt#L1694 > * Activate output scripts in meta.yaml ( #2667 ), but...

Needs regression test and news entry.

Turns out this is not a regression in `conda-build=24.3` but rather `conda-build=24.1` did not exercise code paths which resulted in `PackagesNotFoundError` which is why this has not been shown in...

> Both of these packages have a checksum mistmach and do not download and install. Works for me. All checksums I can think of match and installation works: ```sh #...

I think it is good to have these parts of the build output/process specified which is why I support to have a proposal for it here. I do agree with...

> (tried to use the checkbox, but had issues with it for some reason) @jakirkham It's really odd that it doesn't like to accept your edit :/. I checked "yes"...