Marcel Bargull

@kalefranz, @mcg1969 : I need some help on this one. I completely understand why my changes won't work but I need some assistance on generally understanding how to conceptually prioritize...

I'd argue that different package varieties (i.e., those with different feature requirements) should be separated when version and build numbers are maximized. I pushed a proof of concept for this...

@msarahan, thanks for giving feedback on this, very much appreciated! After spending some more time on (parts of) the feature-associated code, I think I understand @mcg1969 reasoning behind being hesitant...

> But I did at least want to share my thinking And I appreciate that a lot! > But at least one bug report seems to claim that features are...

@mingwandroid: Actually, build number comparison across channels is no issue here. @johanneskoester: The solution to the build number problem is actually not trivial due to build matrices and insufficient information...

[Argh, silly me didn't open that other issue re. build numbers although I said so... sorry] @mcg1969: Thanks for the insights! Out of the 5 options you provided I only...

This is ready for review. ---- CI failures are unrelated and either - SSL certificate related - Happens regularly on Windows and occasionally on Linux in the CI runs for...

Yes, if a newer build with a different summary/description is uploaded, these changes are not reflected on anaconda.org (either through the client or web interface). I think what I would...

Hi @nate-d-olson, > Tried using the hap.py bioconda package but ran into a regex error when run in the snakemake/snakemake container. There is an issue on the hap.py github repo...

Thanks for the ref John! Let's keep both open for now for visibility and continue discussion at the other issue.