Michael Banck

Results 82 comments of Michael Banck

Debian bug (for 1.0, but I tried with 1.2.0): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833770

@plugwash thanks for the hint, I've compared the source and patches for both. Seems parts of Debian's `boost148.patch` were applied in 1.2.0 since 1.1.1, namely the following hunks: ``` +#ifdef...

The following two additional hunks are needed, as the pythonterminal extension includes them: ``` --- ./libavogadro/src/pythoninterpreter.h.orig 2016-09-24 12:22:39.039637527 +0200 +++ ./libavogadro/src/pythoninterpreter.h 2016-09-24 12:23:01.747636759 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ #define PYTHONINTERPRETER_H...

Is there any update on it? Having a symmetric setup for a replication pair and only running backups on the primary strikes me as a valid use-case, and it seems...

Looks like this is required on vanilla Debian where `texlive-fonts-extra` ships Fira fonts, but they are not picked up automatically. The above snippet fixes it for me. As that package...

> Hi @mbanck and @rathann, maybe you could have a look? Having the Fortran API packaged would greatly simplify the installation. I'll be at Debconf in about a week and...

Well, right now I have to maintain it by hand in the Debian package, see e.g. https://salsa.debian.org/debichem-team/cp2k/blob/master/debian/rules#L49 which is cherry-picking a set of (hopefully) not too long-running directories. I think...

> The sharding feature is now in master: [ce328c2](https://github.com/cp2k/cp2k/commit/ce328c223787fa0e3f6e5396f8abd74817664cb6). However, as you pointed out, with these huge differences in directory runtimes it's not quite usable, yet. Hence, I've opened #174....

> For the physconst, there's "This dataset is intended for public access and use." from [here](https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nist-codata-fundamental-physical-constants-srd-121). Well, that field can be "public", "restricted public" or "non-public" according to https://www.nist.gov/director/https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/#accessLevel -...

Side question: I guess `nist_data/srd121_nist-codata-fundamental-physical-constants-2014-metadata.json` is required for license compliance and/or technical reasons?