David Baucum

Results 44 comments of David Baucum

There are a number of situations where this could not be true. For example, some colleges have been reported to [force their students to install fake certs](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/104576/my-college-is-forcing-me-to-install-their-ssl-certificate-how-to-protect-my-pri) to let them...

These are generated from https://vexflow.com/vextab/ ![image](https://github.com/0xfe/vexflow/assets/177150/8295c26c-a86e-4696-918d-d422a5aa86bc) ![image](https://github.com/0xfe/vexflow/assets/177150/c878e8a6-0fb5-444e-9c0a-2de50a41af0d) I would like to generate something like this, from the intro to GN'R's Breakdown intro. ![image](https://github.com/0xfe/vexflow/assets/177150/345bdd48-7819-418b-ba6a-02fbb5b6d0c5) The best aproximation I can get is...

@Tarballwalf this has been resoolved.

This issue is actually related to the F-Droid metadata, not this app. https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/blob/master/metadata/fr.unix_experience.owncloud_sms.yml

I fixed this and my MR was just accepted. I believe the way that the f-droid site works this will not show up until a new release of this app...

I would think support for multiple output formats like [eslint does](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/formatters/) would be best. I did some digging into the source code. I think this would take some non-trivial re-engineering...

This happens when using either MANY_TO_MANY or ONE_TO_MANY join in your query then you cannot iterate over it because it is potentially possible that the same entity could be in...

I do not believe your explanation as to why a distinct is pointless is correct. A `FavoriteAction` can have many `action`s, which would cause the query to return the same...

I wonder if you remove the group by and just leave in the distinct if that would work.

I am seeing the same thing. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/177150/52444507-931d4080-2af6-11e9-94bd-c31808e54e72.png)