Maxime Liquet
Maxime Liquet
There are broken tests so I assume this is still work in progress? A test suite is not a benchmark so I'm not surprised we don't see performance penalties or...
I need to spend more time to review this (not sure I'll have time this week!). My feedback from working on Param 2.0: - I'm not surprised there are performance...
I quickly played around with another implementation (compared to `main`, not to this branch), (ab)using `check_exists`. ```diff diff --git a/param/parameters.py b/param/parameters.py index ed11b53b..8852b79b 100644 --- a/param/parameters.py +++ b/param/parameters.py @@ -2706,9...
Hi @MarcSkovMadsen, some of the performance issues you've opened look like they belong to Param? And Param now has a benchmark suite so we could measure the performance improvements there.
@MarcSkovMadsen could you please report the Python version you are using and your OS?
Seems like it would make Param consistent with all the other HoloViz packages. I think the original intention with Param was that you could just copy one file and use...
I have opened https://github.com/holoviz/param/pull/737 for you to see how it feels to have a warning emitted when a positional argument is passed to a Parameter. ```python # foo.py import param...
@philippjfr do you need this in 2.0?
This is not exactly what the doc says, as it adds that: > which means that it will now watch everything that method watches, and will then get invoked after...
Do you think the docs could be improved? Or do you see that as a feature request?