Max Veit

No, I deliberately chose a different name to make the switch to the new behaviour clear and be able to warn code trying to use the old options. Also, I...

Yup, so as I expected, removing the (-1)^µ phase from librascal's real spherical harmonics (see #346, new convention implemented in [`feat/sph_cs_phase`](https://github.com/cosmo-epfl/librascal/tree/feat/sph_cs_phase)) flips _both_ positive and negative µ contributions (for odd...

Also found this little treasure trove, commented out: https://github.com/cosmo-epfl/librascal/blob/43a410c6d7cea3d17852e9c8c6fe332ec46f13df/src/rascal/representations/calculator_spherical_covariants.hh#L133-L141 As far as I can tell, the only thing this does differently from what's implemented now is that it switches the...

The real benefit of such a framework, in my view, isn't redirection (which is fairly easily done in Python) but rather logging levels, which I know I've had to implement...

And to be fair, quite a bit of the audience we're writing these for will be GAP users who will want to switch for the speed boost (and modern SOAP...

Same issue happens with `ase.io`. You need to import `ase.io` explicitly because the base `ase` module doesn't import it automatically. I agree that it's annoying, and it wouldn't be too...

The closest related issue I can find for ASE is this: https://gitlab.com/ase/ase/-/issues/316 but the reply doesn't make any sense to me.

Was this addressed in a recent PR (#196 perhaps) and, if so, can we close this?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19470873/why-does-gcc-generate-15-20-faster-code-if-i-optimize-for-size-instead-of-speed?rq=1

Sure, sounds like a good idea in principle.