Matthias Demuzere

This fixes this small (irrelevant) mismatch between the dataframes! @theendlessriver13

Hi @VladimirSobral, Thanks for reaching out. What WRF/WPS version are you using? I wonder whether this error message has to do with the change in LCZ class numbers in the...

I see. Ok, so this version of WRF expects the LCZ classes to be numbered 50-61, consistent with the CGLC-MODIS-LCZ dataset. So good to hear that this works. But ......

Hi @wefoust, The only thing you need to do is to change the LCZ class values in LU_INDEX. There is no need to change any of the other parameters. Changing...

Thanks for reviewing @jkittner. I see now that all tests pass. That is great. I have now also updated the README file to reflect the wrf version as a required...

Hi @dargueso, thanks for your feedback on this. Thus far I did not consider the fact that users might feed W2W a geo_em file that already contains LCZ labels, numbered...

> I’ve done that already, it does something similar to what you suggest, except that those changes are implemented only where the code checks ISURBAN. I see. And is ISURBAN...

> ISURBAN is an attribute of the netCDF file and it is a number (13) not a boolean. So if you check which grid points meet ISURBAN, in the new...

Hi @andreazonato, @dargueso, Here a quick summary of what we discussed at EGU24, including some tasks: The enhancement of W2W is still an intermediate solution, to make sure it still...

> I'm already testing that the code works for the three cases and that the generated files work with their respective WRF versions. Thanks @dargueso. I hope all works? When...