Matt Garrish

> These are actually part of the W3C's base styles Ah, okay, I wasn't aware there were organization-specific styles. > For .note, .example, and .advisement, please see: https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/ Thanks, I'll...

Another issue we've just discovered is that if you define a local element with the same name as an HTML element (and I presume SVG), respec will always turn it...

On a procedural note, the first editor's draft is intended to solicit feedback on the more drastic changes proposed so far; it is not feature complete. Issue tracker items, feature...

The working group reviewed this issue on the June 22 call and decided to defer. Questions were raised about the ability to standardize within the remaining timeline.

> plain string or URL, but not both We can formally recommend the value be a plain langugage description, but do we need to ban URLs? (Can we even testably...

Transferring this to the epub-specs repository, as any changes to the requirements and cardinality has to be done there, not in the CG.

> But why would a _certifier_ have several _credentials_ Credentials are just badges of the person who reviewed the publication, not something the reviewer is assigning to the content. It's...

I'm getting the sense we're not going to solve this in the next week, so maybe we should defer this issue? It sounds like we have some work to figure...

Bear in mind that restricting the property at this point isn't within our charter. We can loosen restrictions, but we can't add new restrictions that can invalidate content. I don't...

If we do this, it should be done consistently for the core spec, too. I'd put this in the post-CR cleanup bucket since it's editorial and not critical to have...