Matt Garrish

After discussing with both the WG and CG, the current proposal is to keep the requirement for now but modify it to allow both date and time. We're also adding...

I'm going to merge this and #2746 as we've discussed pretty thoroughly now. Until we merge them, we can't get any further feedback from the issue markers that will stay...

Forgot to add links: [Preview](https://raw.githack.com/w3c/epub-specs/ssv/remove-edupub-terms/wg-notes/ssv/index.html) | [Diff](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://labs.w3.org/spec-generator/%3Ftype=respec%26url=https://w3c.github.io/epub-specs/wg-notes/ssv/index.html&doc2=https://labs.w3.org/spec-generator/%3Ftype=respec%26url=https://raw.githack.com/w3c/epub-specs/ssv/remove-edupub-terms/wg-notes/ssv/index.html)

> shouldn't we add the meta statement for dark mode to the document if we change it with this PR I guess so, although I'm starting to hate the dark...

> I feel the difference on the level of strain on my eyes. It's the opposite for me. I can't look at dark mode for long. I read once that...

What about matching the naming along the lines of our other accessibility documents and make it something like: > EPUB Accessibility -- Fixed Layout Challenges and Best Practices

It puts it under the accessibility umbrella, but I don't think anyone would get too confused by a document called challenges and best practices. The alternative would be to put...

Ya, we ran into this yesterday with the schema.org vocabulary. The spec-generator tool keeps timing out so the diff tool can't get the file to compare against. pr-preview isn't working...

Yes, the diffs are working again. Thanks!

> For all issues related to the spec-generator, you may raise an issue on [its repository](https://github.com/w3c/spec-generator). Okay, thanks!