Mats Lidell

@rswgnu Was thinking of starting all over with this in a new PR but for now just rebased it to bring it close to master so easier to work with....

Starting over again on this in another PR possibly using the built in support for different email composers better.

@rswgnu > This is indeed a problem with the describe-package command which accepts only a single Maintainer That does not seem to be the case. There is even code in...

FYI: I do get the error in still in emacs 30.0.5. The "fix" for allowing multiple Maintainers is here: [bug#62524](https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62524) It speak of a new :maintainers: extra property. Maybe that...

> I agree that as hbut:act does a check that the button sent in is valid, so too should ibut:act and ebut:act (the new versions you wrote). What do you...

> Have to discuss this on the phone. Too involved for me to think through it in a message right now. Trying to do some work on HyRolo to eliminate...

@rswgnu Added check on type of but and corresponding test cases. PTAL

@rswgnu Did an update on the error message, renamed the parameters and added a test for when there is no hbut:current. PTAL

Emacs initialization can be a bit tricky. My basic initialization code looks like this. ``` ;; Use own version for development if it exists (when (file-exists-p "~/src/hyperbole") (add-to-list 'load-path "~/src/hyperbole"))...

> approved these changes Thanks. Maybe I'll look a bit deeper at it first unless you think it is a show stopper now and we should use it as work...