Mats Dufberg
Mats Dufberg
Thank you for pointing this out. The message comes fom test case [Address02], which we have identified as needing update. Also see another issue pointing this out, #946. [Address02]: https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/develop/docs/specifications/tests/Address-TP/address02.md
Create an instruction for creating or updating TC specifications.
I transfered the issue to the Zonemaster/Zonemaster repository where test specifications belong. This is best handled as an update to Nameserver09. @andreasschulze, if you have an example of such a...
Thank you. When I test `drinkerei.com. MX ?` and `mirissima.de. MX ?` I get inconsistent replies with the same case in question. Sometimes MX in response, sometimes NODATA. Repeated queries...
Do you already have a suggestion for those steps?
> Maybe we could add something like this to the end of "Merge develop branch into master"? I guess it must be a separate step after the release. It should...
Thanks. That is a good point. [Delegation02] needs an update. [Delegation02]: https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/master/docs/specifications/tests/Delegation-TP/delegation02.md
Thanks for raising the issue. This issue is about the DNSSEC10 test case. It has be observed before. Issue #1048 points at a solution for that.
> I was also unsure about where to add these new test cases. I’ve added them in `Zone` because that’s where the tests involving MX records are, but they could...
Validation of an SPF policy according to the RFC is quite complex!