Mats Dufberg
Mats Dufberg
We should have one test case that reports any issue to reach the DNSKEY, not multiple test cases. Preliminary I do not think it should be this test case. When...
@pamasse, can you look at this? If the description in section 8, "Produce distribution zip file", in [Release Processes] is incorrect or incomplete, the issue belongs here. Else, it should...
@mattias-p, does [undelegated-test.md] cover parts of whet you are asking for? [undelegated-test.md]: https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/master/docs/specifications/test-types/undelegated-test.md
Please note that PR #591 only created a placeholder to prevent ugly 404 errors. I did not solve this issue that should be kept open.
Updated DNSSEC02 (#782) and created DNSSEC13 (#780) probably makes DNSSEC12 not needed any more.
@blacksponge, could you look at this PR again?
DNSKEY with empty keys are probably very rare, and I suggest that we should handle them in a cheap way, i.e. not spend too much code on them. Ignoring such...
That would mean that we should add that to every test case that is dependent on DNSKEYs. It is probably extremely rare that DNSKEY is empty. There cannot be any...
> > It is probably extremely rare that DNSKEY is empty. There cannot be any RRSIGs using such DNSKEYs since they cannot be created and cannot be validated. > >...
> I think this is a good approach. While the scope of test cases we have today is a zone, the scope of this kind of test case is a...