Nico Matentzoglu

I am happy to help with this issue, but I am not sure what aspects you would like comments on. Can you create a comment that has a list of...

Excellent @nataled, thanks for breaking that down for me. Three more comments before I get to your questions: > Version IRI MUST be unique to the stated version. BAD: AUTOMATED...

Too complicated to write in text, please both watch this 4 minute video explaining the situation: https://www.loom.com/share/c943c088848f4d418a901ee85658a4e6 @pbuttigieg in essence you are right (its about inconsistent patterns being used).

> What you you think about the related issue of multiple test targets in src/envo/Makefile (including importation of other Makefiles)? I would like to have one single test target and...

@balhoff can you provide something more of a conceptual recipe for this? Say we have PATO:1 sub CHEBI:2 sub COB:3 - would I only include CHEBI:2 sub COB:3? And have...

@anitacaron would you want to look into this? Else, we would have to find another volunteer to see if that information is readily available in https://github.com/obophenotype/ncbitaxon/blob/f0b391c39878220570c566342f16173fd1a6203f/Makefile#L16

I would prefer option (3) (allowing multiple synonym types in OBO format) but given how much of a task that is (I made a placeholder issue here https://github.com/owlcollab/oboformat/issues/153) I agree...

Yes we are in agreement. If such a change is introduced it will be in some hypothetical new major version of obo format (1.6, 1.7), which has plenty of breaking...

No longer needed

@pkalita-lbl Thanks a ton for your help, I made issues for everything and will resume work here once they are resolved. Thank you!