Martin Liška

> Maybe we should add this to the project readme (if it isn't already there)? Definitely. Are you willing to send a pull request for it?

> Can do! Do you think we should put it into `PASS_BUG_INFO.TXT`? We could even automatically generate a "template" interestingness test? Yes and yes. We can generate cvise command line...

Any update on this, please?

Don't hurry, I just wanted to remind it. It's good you're slowly, but surely getting to it.

Thank you very much for the testing effort, I would expect quite some cvise crashes for various inputs. Luckily, one is not blocked by a single crash during a reduction,...

Sorry. Well, it's not so easy, but you can call cvise `--start-with-pass IncludesPass` and then somehow identify with `--verbose` that it's not doing progress. Do you have a reproducer I...

And you can also lower `GIVEUP_CONSTANT = 50000` in `cvise/utils/testing.py` and then grep for the message.

Thank you for the report. I'm pretty sure there are passes that remove tokens (or group of tokens) and these should handle the removal of `public:`. About the replacement of...

> Interesting this is a transformation that I quite often have to do manually and is at least in our code basis (declaring non-pod types as class as described in...

Thank you for testing build on Windows! I'm seeking for somebody who can help me with that. I fixed the 2 errors you mentioned and I'm curious about compiler warning...