Martin O'Connor

Are you referring to SWRL rules? If so, the SWRL language specification does not support any weighting - and such a weighting would not naturally fit with the language's semantics....

Supporting these clauses would be great. As a first step I'd suggest taking the class and individual declaration integration tests at: https://github.com/protegeproject/mapping-master-integration-tests/tree/master/src/test/java/org/mm/renderer/owlapi as a baseline to create three new renderer...

Unfortunately, we have not had the time/funding to complete this functionality. It may still happen at some point in the future but we can not commit to a timeline.

Take a look at the mapping-master-example repo: https://github.com/protegeproject/mapping-master-example It has some example code that shows API usage. In particular, look at: https://github.com/protegeproject/mapping-master-example/blob/master/src/main/java/org/mm/example/MMExample.java

This is a known issue caused by my use of the non thread safe Date class. (The integration tests run in parallel so can provoke the issue.) I will take...

Which reasoner are you referring to? I would post this question to the Protege mailing list: https://protege.stanford.edu/support.php

You do not need to use the group operator . Take a look at this query: https://github.com/protegeproject/swrlapi/wiki/SQWRLCollections#negation-as-failure

Can you post the ontology (change .owl to .owl.txt because GitHub does not support the .owl extension) and I can take a look.

This is very odd. I will take a look.

Works fine for me. See enclosed file containing your classes and individuals and a SQWRL query. [SQWRLCAAReport.owl.txt](https://github.com/protegeproject/swrlapi/files/3199667/SQWRLCAAReport.owl.txt)