Spandan Barve

which one of these approaches would be preferable according to the standards of other implementations in the codebas? @Planeshifter @kgryte

> @marsian83 Perhaps before actually implementing this function and inlining the implementation, you should propose implementing `@stdlib/complex/base/parse-string`, which implements the tokenizer/parser and, if the string is valid, returns a complex-like...

> @marsian83 Please run `make init`, which will initialize the missing ESLint plugin. Hi, now I am just getting different errors

> @marsian83 Perhaps before actually implementing this function and inlining the implementation, you should propose implementing `@stdlib/complex/base/parse-string`, which implements the tokenizer/parser and, if the string is valid, returns a complex-like...

Now that the `@stdlib/complex/base/parse` has been implemented This can now be implemented as well. I will get to working on this.

Hi @Maniktherana, you may check the responsiveness in #469 The PR has not yet been merged as some minor changes are to be made still But you may check if...