Markus Lehtonen

Rebased

Hi @rptaylor. Yes, this would be useful and I've been thinking this myself as part of the work I've done on #464 and particularly #468 which are very much on...

> What would be the use case to only taint a portion of nodes with a given feature and configuration? Reserving some of the nodes for general usage or alternatively...

I have plans to implement this on top of #553. @rptaylor I think I agree with you above. Partial/proportional tainting is much more complicated with problematic corner cases (e.g. with...

For consistency, we'd need to support this for both nfd-worker config (configuration of `custom` source), I think. This means that we need to update our gRPC interface, too, to send...

Moving to v0.12.0

We still want this. Not a huge deal in terms of implementation but somebody® just has to do it /remove-lifecycle stale

Regarding the hooks, thanks @eero-t for starting this discussion. I basically agree with this and have been anxious about the hook support myself, especially after we introduced the minimal image....

Hi @mac-chaffee and thanks for reporting this. I understand the issue. I'm just don't think this is the right fix 🧐 At a quick glance (on my weary eyes and...

After sleeping over this I don't think this kind of filtering is the right way to solve the problem. It will just open up corner cases that may bite us...