yinyonghong
yinyonghong
`for_each(ranges, [](int x) {....` `for_each(par, first, last, [](int x) {....` is enough to demonstrate the intent and the syntax is clear.
The last one is better and more readable.
It's not bad. It just has redundant test
int i {0}; is better than int i{0} . :)
The guideline has said "Yes, there are genuine examples where a do-statement is a clear statement of a solution, but also many bugs."
could u show a dome to change?
How to deploy it under XAMPP?