Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas
> Otherwise, what would be the point ? Indeed. I think this is sufficiently obvious that we can clarify it in 2.0. I'll work on some updates.
Ah. As I look into this it gets more complex. I'm using `String` throughout here but the issue also includes `Reader`, `ByteBuffer`, `InputStream` and any other type explicitly mentioned when...
I like this idea. It is simple and clear.
This change would need to wait until Jakarta EE 10. Level 2 introduces reserved string expansion and fragment expansion. We can ignore fragment expansion as clients (should) never send the...
Exposing the session via the `SendResult` looks possible. The comments re `SessionException` appear to be implementation specific. Tomcat, for example, never uses it. Neither does the WebSocket API. I wonder...
@joakime What did you have in mind over and above adding `Session` to `SendResult` and returning `Future` rather than `Future`? Note: In the `Future` case, any errors will be exposed...
> So you see a use that might look like this? Yes, something along those lines.
I've been looking at this some more. `Future` -> `Future` isn't binary compatible so I don't see an easy way to do that. I think that is OK though as...
I've starting a thread in the servlet project to discuss adding an `access()` method to `HttpServlet`.
I tried to explain the point of this here: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/servlet-dev/msg00570.html Good point about HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 - I need to look into how authenticated WebSockets work in those scenarios. Any...