Mark Murphy

I made a comment on the other parallelisation issue: https://github.com/xunit/xunit/issues/1986#issuecomment-669429834. Yes, it would be really great to have the ability to run tests in parallel when using a collection fixture....

Even when there is a class/collection fixture that doesn't necessarily mean parallel running of tests is a problem. In my case I set up a collection fixture to instance a...

Thanks Martin, appreciate your response! It would be really great if additional code were not required and that multiple `secrets.json` files were supported out of the box by means of...

Interesting that you should write about this. I'm currently moving away from AutoRest and have been evaluating Kiota and NSwag and this is the issue that is pushing me to...

Thanks for the detailed replies @baywet . > Assuming we go down that route, what would you expect during serialization/deserialization? if an object has a non-nullable property, the default value...

Thanks @darrelmiller for your input. > Are there other scenarios where "required" is useful other than during creation? Please remember we are talking about client-side models where personally the primary...

Yes, I would also be super interested in this feature. Some exciting updates to MSTest recently which have got my attention but won't migrate to MSTest without this.

For info I just submitted an issue for ASP.NET Core to support local secrets created by PowerShell Secrets Management: https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/21287. This for me would be in fact a better solution...

HI @JustinGrote , thanks for this, appreciated. While local secrets via PowerShell would be more secure actually since secrets.json is only really for local debug that's not the biggest reason...

You can see an example use of the flexible header here: https://github.com/finlabsuk/open-banking-connector/blob/master/Sources/OpenBankingConnector/jws.swift. (I've temporarily made the OBC project dependent on the fork.)