Oleg Gaidarenko
Oleg Gaidarenko
We already received comments from @julianshapiro - https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/3143#issuecomment-224105768, you want them to be more descriptive? Furthermore we have explanation in description ticket - https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/3143 > We ignore RAF's high resolution...
> @joliss didn't see it dropping frames. I don't think these conditions were met - > it can be significantly offset when the browser is under **high stress** That's why...
> The exception being an environment that provides a truthy (timestamp) argument to rAF callbacks but does not expose window.performance.now, in which animation ticks would set fxNow to the wrong...
Do we plan to land this? It's open for quite some time now
> I hope to fix the selector issue by abandoning getElementsByTagName. If you try this approach, would you mind providing perf tests?
Yep, i suspect there should be some pitfalls like that, i would like to see something like this as resolution of this issue.
Yep, that's why I created this issue now
Right, that is way i said we need comprehensive research (including implementation details) and not just one perf link.